In 1991 two German tourists stumbled across a body buried in
the ice of the Alps between Italy & Austria. Initially thought to be the
body of an early 20th century climber, it turned out to be the body
of a man who had died 5,000 years ago. Given the name Ötzi, he died
of an arrow wound and it was theorized he was a shepherd.
The most fascinating thing about Ötzi wasn’t where he died
or how he died, or even when he died, but rather, the condition of his health.
If we listen to people today, we’d imagine that Ötzi would have been an
ironman, having never tasted Spam or M&M’s or Hamburger Helper and having
eaten only natural, by definition, organic, food. As such, he should have been
in perfect shape.
But, sadly,
he wasn’t. He suffered from a parasite, had been sick three times in the
six months before he died, his teeth were full of cavities, he was lactose
intolerant and his lungs were blackened by smoke. Estimated to be aged 45 when
he died, Ötzi was not the posterchild for health one might expect listening to
those who decry pesticides or canned food or GMOs.
The thing is, Ötzi may may indeed be a posterchild, but for
something completely different. The
reality is Ötzi was old when he died.
For almost all of recorded history the average lifespan of
humans has been below 30 years. A number of factors went into that,
including high infant mortality rates – sometimes
reaching 35%, war, famine, disease, dangerous working conditions, etc.
The bottom line is that for most of history, life for humans
has been characterized by scarcity, war, slavery, poor health and short lives. Across
the spectrum, from when men were hunting and gathering to when they developed
agriculture, from when they were nomads to when they developed great empires,
life expectancy stood between 30 & 40 years for the most privileged and
usually less than that for the average person.
The reality is, beginning about 200 years ago advances of
almost every kind began an upward trajectory that more than doubled the life
expectancy in the west and significantly improved it virtually everywhere else.
To understand the degree of impact that upward trajectory look at the people living in
abject poverty. In 1820 the
percentage of people around the world living in abject poverty – defined in
this case by less than $1 a day (or the then equivalent) was above 85%. Today, a mere 200 years later in man’s 200,000
year plus journey, that number has dropped to below 10%.
But it’s not just the level of poverty that has
changed. On practically every single
other metric, from the basic to the frivolous, the world has improved.
Transportation: In 1820 it took 4-6 months to cross the
continent in a Conestoga wagon. Today you could drive (respecting the speed
limits) from New York to LA in as few as four days, but if you wanted to fly
you could be there in 3 hours.
Communication: Prior to the invention of the telegraph in
1844 the fastest way to communicate was with smoke signals and the horses and
riders of the Pony Express. Today anyone with a smartphone can talk to someone
on the other side of the world in real time.
Information: For most of our history almost all humans were
illiterate, and most never even had a written language. People learned news and
stories through listening to others or looking at stained glass windows or
reading books or newspapers. Today we
have endless news, movies, sports and every conceivable form of media available
from around the world at our fingertips 24 hours a day.
Housing: In 1790 the
average size of a house in the United States was 831 square feet with almost 6
people living in it. Today
the average size of a house in the United States is 2,496 square feet with
an average household of 2.5 people. That
means that today the average American has 998 square feet of living space at
home, seven times the 138 they had when the country was founded.
And the conveniences in that house are exponentially
greater. From indoor plumbing to
refrigerators to non-wood burning stoves to lights to televisions to wi-fi, air
conditioning and much more. Nor is it
just the new inventions: Those homes are
also filled with things like furniture and pots and pans and beds of a quality
and quantity that most people in history if they owned at all, were of the
barest nature unless a member of the elite.
Clothing: Through
most of history people would typically have 2 or 3 sets of clothes which would
include 2 for work and 1 for Sunday – at least in the Christian tradition. And
those clothes would often be used until they fell apart and were rarely
washed. Today open the closet and or
dresser in almost any American bedroom and you’ll find suitcases of cloths,
many that go without wearing for months or years. The same holds true for shoes, and like the
clothes, the selection of the shoes worn by Americans today is lightyears ahead
in quality and style choice of those worn by people of most history.
Work: Prior to the middle of the 19th century,
90% + of the world’s population worked in farming or food harvesting of one
sort of another. Today, in the US that number is below 5%, which essentially
means that almost every job that any American has today didn’t exist for most
of human history, and the resulting
workplaces are dramatically safer as well.
Democratic government:
Today, depending on how you count them, between
25% and 45% of the
world’s population live in nations with some form of democratic government.
That compares to essentially 0% when the United States was founded.
There is of course, much more, from the selection of and
accessibility to food, the quality of healthcare, the existence of leisure time
and the variety of activities with which to fill it.
Of course things aren’t perfect and people still want to fix
them. Sometimes life’s unfair, people
can be jerks and our government takes our money to give to grifters and the
healthcare system is a clusterfark. All
of those things and many more are true.
But at the end of the day, for as much as things suck, in the big
picture most of us have lives kings would have salivated over throughout
history. Most certainly would think I think the pre-arrow Ötzi would have
traded places with any of us. I think that
gets lost on too many people, particularly on the left.
The point of all of this is not to suggest that we hold
hands and sing Kumbaya over the dinner table this Christmas season. Not at all.
But sometimes, particularly around family in the tight environs of the holiday,
it makes sense to step back and focus on what we have in common and what we’re
grateful for rather than what divides us. There’s more than enough time for the
latter once the new year rolls around.
Follow me on X at @ImperfectUSA

No comments:
Post a Comment