When he embarked on his journey to discover a path to India Christopher Columbus’ lead ship was the Santa Maria. Built in 1460 it measured 62 ft with a crew of just 40, the Santa Maria would take Columbus to the New World and would change the course of human history.
Half a century earlier there was another man who sailed
ships who didn’t change the course of human history. His name was Zheng He and
he commanded the Chinese navy during the early 15th century.
His Treasure Ships were
not only larger than the Santa Maria, they were more than six times the size,
measuring 440 feet long with a crew of 600. And Zheng had an armada of them at
his disposal during his seven Treasure Journeys between 1405 and 1433 that
took him as far away as the Red Sea and the east coast of Africa.
Zheng’s navy was by far the most powerful the world had
ever seen and he used it to explore and initiate trade and tribute routes. And
what did the Chinese do with this extraordinary power? Nothing. After Zheng’s
death the Treasure Journeys stopped. The Chinese had traditionally been an
inward looking society and after Zheng’s 30 year exploration aberration, the
old tradition returned.
Why are we not speaking Chinese today? Why didn’t the Chinese conquer the world (or at least try) when they had a navy exponentially superior to anything else in the world? Why did the kingdom that gave us paper and gunpowder not go on to dominate the world of commerce or ideas? Because the Chinese had very little competition in the area of said ideas. Ruled by an emperor who was all powerful, competition in the realm of ideas was rarely tolerated in China for most of its history, nevermind flourish. What the emperor said was gospel. And the emperor said we stay home.
Similar kingdoms held dominion over wide swaths of land yet had a very limited impact on the world beyond. The Mongol empire comes to mind, which was the largest contiguous empire in human history or the countless Muslim empires, up to and including the Ottoman empire. Robust competition of ideas did not exist in those empires any more than it did in China, and indeed most of us are not speaking Mongol nor Arabic nor Turkish.
Now compare that to the west. At one point the British Empire covered a quarter of the world’s landmass and a quarter of her people. Today more people speak English than any other language on the planet. There may be a billion people speaking Chinese, but 95% of them live in China while 95% of the English speakers don’t live in England. Similarly half a billion people speak Spanish and less than 10% of them live in Spain.
Beyond that, almost every aspect of life for most people
today is the result of western ideas. Cars, phones, planes, elevators,
televisions, cameras, computers, MRI machines, DNA testing, heart transplants,
nuclear power, space travel, fracking, movies, advanced agriculture and much
much more. For all intents and purposes, the west developed the modern world.
And for all of its current deprivation, it is extraordinary.
So what accounts for the difference of the impact between
what the Chinese accomplished over the last thousand years and what Europe did?
Simple. Competition. And, in particular, the competition of ideas.
Competition, more than any single thing, is responsible for
the advances of the west. Between countries there’s been competition. Within
countries there’s been competition. Within religions there’s been competition
which sometimes split sides across countries and between them. And the
competition was relentless, frequently resulting in bloodshed and oftentimes in
war, sometimes lots of both. In addition, alliances shifted regularly between
countries and within them. There was rivalry, there was espionage and of course
there was betrayal and treachery.
The real competition that helped to create the world we
live in evolved in the centuries following the collapse of the Roman empire.
What we know of today as France, Germany, Spain, Italy and Britain didn’t exist
then. They formed over hundreds of years of competing tribes, towns and estates
that evolved into domains and then into kingdoms.
Initially chieftains would compete with one another for the
loyalty of local peasants in an effort to increase their power and holdings
using such incentives as more food in exchange for their labor or fealty. Those
chieftains would eventually evolve into local nobility and continue to expand
their lands. Later, particularly in times of more instability dukes or kings
would compete for the allegiance of local nobility by offering lower taxes or
more freedom than their opponents.
The reality of this can be seen in the evolution of
European nations, particularly France, Italy and Germany. The ebb and
flow of borders over the 1500 years since the fall of Rome has been nothing
less than stunning. And each of those nations, plus Britain and Spain were the
core drivers of the evolution of civilization over the last 500 years.
All of that evolution came about because of competition,
whether driven by ideas, religion, or simple power. At different times over
that span the French were fighting against the British, the Spanish, the Papal
States, Austria, the Prussians, the Russians and more. At other times they were
fighting alongside those same nations. Britain and Italy and Germany and the
rest of Europe have similarly chaotic histories.
And it wasn’t just external fighting. France, like most
western countries, saw vast amounts of internal strive as the landed gentry and
various regions fought one another for dominance or liberation. The same holds
true for religion. While Christianity dominated Europe, the reality is that it
battled with Islam for dominance for centuries and at one point in the 8th century
only being stopped at Poitiers in France and 900 years later at the gates of
Vienna, Austria. Simultaneously Christianity battled itself bloody for the 500
years following the Reformation.
As if all of that chaos wasn’t enough, sometimes power and
religion made for strange bedfellows such as when Francis I of France partnered with the Muslim Ottoman sultan
Suleiman the Great in the 16th century
to fight their fellow Christians the Hapsburgs who controlled much of Europe
beyond France at the time.
The most obvious outcome of all of this fighting and the
shifting of alliances was a competition of ideas for everything from developing
improved weapons of war to advances in art and architecture to science and
math. Whether it resulted in competition to build the largest cathedral or the
most luxurious palace, the most accurate painting style or the most efficient
gun barrel, such advances were the fertilizer that fed modern civilization.
It’s no wonder that this is where the Renaissance, the Age of Enlightenment,
the Industrial Revolution and advances such as flight, DNA, computers,
cellphones and the Internet originated. So too freedom of the press, speech,
religion and free markets, resulting in widespread prosperity and freedoms
never before seen in human history.
All of that hangs in the balance as western nations face
the catastrophic amalgamation of the woefully uninformed left, the rapidly
increasing anti-freedom Muslim populations and increasingly despotic
governments willing to abandon fundamental western principles in their pursuit
of power. The $64,000 question is, how do we maintain those principles while
increasingly those among us detest them and technology makes it easier than
ever to target and marginalize those willing to stand up for them…